Sequencing tells us which happened first
When was the Sphinx built? The archaeological evidence points
with a high degree of probability to the reign of Pharaoh
Khafre, rather than to much earlier dates proposed in recent
popular theories. Archaeological sequencing at the Sphinx
supports the Khafre date. Sequencing in archaeology looks
at when one event happened in relation to another.
Egyptian architects created funerary monuments in somewhat
standard sets. During the period of pyramid building, the
set generally consisted of a pyramid, pyramid temple, causeway,
and valley temple. Some pyramid complexes included queens’
pyramids.
Khafre’s building program differed from standard Old
Kingdom pyramid complexes in that it included his pyramid,
the Sphinx, Sphinx Temple, causeway, and Valley Temple, but
did not include pyramids for the pharaoh’s queens.
Respecting walls
Two temples occupy a low terrace in front of the Sphinx:
Khafre’s Valley Temple at the end of his pyramid causeway
and the Sphinx Temple.
Khafre built enclosure walls north and south of his Valley
Temple. Parts of the south wall still exist, but the ancient
builders removed most of the north wall.
You can still see the foundation track for the northern enclosure
wall stones in front of the southeast corner of the Sphinx
Temple. Part of the wall was incorporated into the southern
wall of the Sphinx Temple.
The western end of the southern Valley Temple enclosure wall
turns a corner and attaches to the southern side of the Temple. The last block
still fits over and “respects” the small granite
block of a low bench, which ran along the south, east, and
north sides of the Valley Temple.
In archaeology we say that one element respects another when
the evidence reveals that builders worked around an earlier
structure when building a later structure.
For example, if you had a fence that stopped at the wall
of your house, we’d say that the fence respects the
house wall.
If we found that the
foundation cut across the line of holes dug for the fence
posts, we would say the house foundation post-dates the fence
line. We can then sequence the fence and the house foundation
in the order of time that they were built. In the latter example
the fence line was built first.
Since Khafre’s Valley Temple enclosure wall respects
the granite casing on Khafre’s Temple, the wall was
built after the casing was in place. This is important when
we then try to sequence the adjacent Sphinx Temple.
Ancient recycling
When Khafre’s architects built the Sphinx and the Sphinx
Temple, they removed the northern Valley Temple enclosure
wall leaving a portion of it in place, incorporating that
leftover part into the new Sphinx Temple southern wall.
So we can say:
- The Valley Temple enclosure wall respects the Valley
Temple casing stones.
- The Valley Temple therefore predates its now-missing
northern enclosure wall.
- Part of the Valley Temple enclosure wall was later incorporated
into the Sphinx Temple southern wall.
- The Sphinx Temple was therefore built later than the
Valley Temple.
This becomes even more important when you look at clear evidence
indicating that the stones for the Sphinx Temple came from
the lowest layers of the Sphinx quarry. We can sequence three
of Khafre’s monuments in the following way:
- The Sphinx is carved from the same quarry as the core
blocks in the two lower Khafre temples.
- The Sphinx Temple was built using blocks from the Member
II layer of the Sphinx quarry.
- The core blocks of the Sphinx Temple are matched geologically
and archaeologically to the lower layers of Member II of the Sphinx
quarry, indicating that the Sphinx lower body and Sphinx Temple were
part of the same quarry-construction sequence.
There is no current evidence (that stands up to the scrutiny
of science) pointing to any other date for the Khafre monuments.
The best statement science can make is that with a high degree
of probability the Sphinx and the Sphinx Temple were constructed
late in the sequence of the Khafre building program during
the reign of that king.
For more on AERA’s work with the Sphinx,
see AERAGram Vol. 5 No. 2, Spring 2002.
|